While there is a "broad measure of agreement" on the draft creditor-loss rules, governments have just over a week to resolve their differences before the ministers convene in Luxembourg on June 21, according to an EU document prepared for the meeting and obtained by Bloomberg News.
Nations are divided over how much flexibility regulators should be given to exempt some creditors from writedowns, according to the document prepared by Ireland, which holds the EU's rotating presidency. Some governments contend that uniform rules are needed "to ensure legal certainty and a level playing field in the single market," while others "would prefer a larger degree of discretion," the document shows.
The EU's 27 governments are racing to meet an end-June deadline to agree on the plans, which leaders have said will be a first step toward more ambitious moves to centralise bank interventions in the 17-nation euro area.
Under draft plans presented last year by Michel Barnier, the EU's financial services chief, losses at a crisis-hit bank would be absorbed first by wiping out its capital, then writing down unsecured debt holders in order of seniority.
Standing funds
Nations would also be required to build up standing funds that would be tapped to cover restructuring costs at failed lenders. These resolution funds would be financed with levies on banks.
The plans must be approved by governments and by the European Parliament before they take effect.
Compromise texts drawn up by Ireland would hand regulators the power to exempt derivatives from writedowns, if including these would cause more harm than good.
Regulators could also, exceptionally, exempt a creditor from losses if legal or practical reasons make it impossible to impose a writedown "within a reasonable time," according to the Irish document, dated June 10. Such exemptions would be capped at five per cent of a particular class of creditors.
"Any further changes to the balance of the text towards greater flexibility is likely to be challenged by the group of member states who favor harmonisation," according to the document. This "could make agreement more difficult to achieve."
Compromise plan
Such changes would also need to be counterbalanced by toughening draft rules on the minimum amount of securities banks must issue that could be subject to a so-called bail-in, or by increasing the required size of resolution funds, according to the document.
Under the current compromise plan, national resolution funds would be required to have reserves equivalent to 0.5 percent of insured deposits in that country.
Nations are also split over whether the bail-in powers should take effect in 2015 or 2018, according to the document, which advocates a 2018 start date.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
