Higher liability in N-Bill will make nuclear power costly

Image
Sanjay Jog Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 1:11 AM IST

A report by Parliament’s Standing Committee on Science and Technology has noted that the higher the liability limit in the civil nuclear liability Bill, the higher would be the cost of producing nuclear-generated electricity. The report was tabled in Parliament yesterday.

The department of financial services argued before the committee that the higher the liability limit, the higher would be the insurance premium and subsequently higher would be the cost of producing nuclear-generated electricity.

A nuclear expert, who did not want to be quoted, told Business Standard that: “If a policy is taken for 300 million SDR (Special Drawing Rights), then at the premium rate of 1.8 per cent to 2.7 per cent suggested by the department of financial services, the premium comes to Rs 51.75 crore per month, Rs 621 crore in a year and if one takes 40 years as life time of a plant, then it is Rs 24,840 crore. Of course, it is assumed that the premium will remain static for 40 years.”

Regarding the capability of Indian insurance companies, the department said India could build up expertise over a period of time.

The finance secretary before the committee argued that conceptually, there did not seem to be a symmetrical apportionment of responsibilities between the nuclear operator and the government, while fixing the cap of Rs 500 crore as the amount of liability under clause 6 (2) of the nuclear liability Bill.

He also said the finance ministry would be more happy, if there was no specific cut-off of Rs 500 crore or Rs 600 crore. It would be better if it was possible to quantify the risk of nuclear installations and in any case, the operator should have bulk of the responsibility, he added.

He also argued that the government’s liability should be quantified in the Bill, so that there was clarity on who had to bear what part of the responsibility in the event of an accident. In case of liability, the point of burden-sharing between the government and the operator should be based on an exact formula.

The finance ministry had suggested a formula-based limitation be considered, which matched the regime for the operator to the types of accidents that might occur so as to incentivise adherence to the higher safety standards, limit negligence and encourage practice of highest international standards, while providing reasonable and scientifically determined cover by the government.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 20 2010 | 1:27 AM IST

Next Story