The Financial Stability Board said in a report today that "few jurisdictions have equipped administrative authorities with the full set of powers to resolve banks." Many countries also lack frameworks to recognise actions taken by foreign regulators in a cross-border crisis, which is a "major weakness," the FSB said.
Cyprus became a testing ground for investor losses when euro-area authorities last month required restructuring of the country's two biggest banks as a condition of a Euro 10-billion rescue.
The Cyprus program, billed by European policy makers as a unique case, imposes losses on bondholders and uninsured depositors and was accompanied by capital controls to limit contagion.
"Most of the recommendations that involve actions by national authorities can -- and should -- be implemented now without waiting for additional FSB guidance," said the FSB, a global group of central bankers and financial supervisors from the Group of 20 nations with headquarters in Basel, Switzerland.
The FSB recommended that nations give local regulators the authority to write down creditors' claims and give them the ability to make changes to a banks' organizational structure "where it is necessary to improve their resolvability," according to the report.
The FSB's review echoes comments made by International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde, who said the "oversize banking model is still very dangerous" in a speech in New York yesterday.
EU Law
European Union leaders have set a June deadline for governments and the European Parliament to agree on legislation setting out how authorities should handle bank failures, including through so-called creditor bail-ins.
In the absence of such a system, nations have injected 1.7 trillion euros into their banking systems since the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., according to European Commission data.
The law, "once approved, will represent a major step forward in aligning the resolution regimes of EU member states," the FSB said.
Other recommendations from the group include introducing powers for regulators to freeze the status of financial contracts during a crisis and ensuring legal structures are capable of resolving non-banks, such as insurance, securities and investment firms.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
