Rs 1,000-cr loss in loan recovery via DRTs

Image
John Samuel Raja D New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 29 2013 | 3:14 AM IST

An internal audit undertaken by the Finance Ministry has revealed that officers entrusted to recover debt as per the orders of debt recovery tribunals (DRTs) often settled cases at a low amount, leading to a loss of at least Rs 1,036 crore.

Interestingly, these recovery officers (RO) do not have the power to reduce the amount stated in the order issued by the presiding officer (PO).

“The recovery officer has absolutely no powers to stay, alter or close the case without recovering the full amount mentioned in the Recovery Certificate. In simple words, the RO can’t go beyond the decree passed by the presiding officer and he has to go by the letter and spirit of the decree passed by the PO,” the office of chief controller of accounts wrote in the annual review of internal audit, Ministry of Finance.

The annual review was published “to point out irregularities or deficiencies which need the immediate attention of the Heads of Departments”, S M Kumar, chief controller of Accounts, said in the review for 2007-08.

The debt recovery tribunals were set up for the speedy recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions. At present, there are 30 DRTs and 5 debt recovery appellate tribunals. DRTs take up cases of only Rs 10 lakh and above.

Among 2909 cases involving Rs 1,538 crore, the RO have closed the cases after instructions from the banks, leading to an under recovery of Rs 1,325 crore. Here also, the RO does not have the power to close cases.

Recommending further investigation, the annual review said, “The authority under which the cases have been closed by the RO at his own level has not been explained”.

Likewise, the audit review also found the recovery officers closed certain cases based on the instructions from the bank at an amount of Rs 288.59 crore.

In the case of debts recovery tribunal, Lucknow, it was found that irregular closure of a particular case resulted in a loss of Rs 83 lakh. The internal audit also found 137 cases where recovery proceedings were prematurely closed by the recovery officer.

In an internal audit of another DRT in Nagpur, it was noted that 436 recovery certificates involving Rs 407 crore were pending as on March 31, 2007. Despite vast powers given under relevant regulation in Maharastra - such as attachment of property, arrest and detention of debtors- the delay in execution has been observed, the review said.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 31 2008 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story