Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott Tuesday refused to apologise for spying on telephone conversations of the Indonesian president and other senior ministers.
Indonesia demanded that Australia apologise over claims that Australian spies in 2009 targeted the mobile phone of Indonesia's President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, along with those of his wife and closest confidants, after the Australian Broadcasting Cooperation's (ABC) report Monday revealed details of the spying activities, Xinhua reported.
Indonesia recalled its ambassador from Canberra Monday and is reviewing all cooperation with the Australian government.
According to media reports, the Indonesian president has lashed out at Tony Abbott in a series of angry tweets, accusing him of taking the spying scandal too lightly.
In a statement to the Australian parliament Tuesday, Abbott said Australia should not be expected to apologise for the steps it took to protect itself now or in the past, "any more than other governments should be expected to apologise for similar steps that they have taken".
"The first duty of every government is to protect the country and to advance its national interests," Abott said.
Abott said he wanted to make it "absolutely crystal clear" that Australia has "deep respect" for Indonesia.
"I regard President Yudhoyono as a good friend of Australia, indeed as one of the very best friends that we have anywhere in the world," he said in the House of Representatives.
"That's why, Madam Speaker, I sincerely regret any embarrassment that recent media reports have caused him."
"It is in everyone's interests - Indonesia's no less than Australia's - that cool heads prevail and that our relationship grows closer, not more distant," Abbott added.
Meanwhile, the head of ABC has defended its reporting of the Australia-Indonesia spy furore, saying the story is in public interest.
"I think it was an important story that should have been told," ABC Managing Director Mark Scott told a Senate estimates hearing in Canberra Tuesday.
According to him, while the story might be embarrassing and could cause some short-term difficulties between the two countries, a debate was taking place all over the world on the reach of government spy agencies in the digital age.
"What information can be procured, what information can be shared - I think the story yesterday (Monday) centrally went to that," Mark Scott said.
"It caused some damage to Australia in the short term, but I think we would say that reporting was absolutely in the public interest and it was probably in the national interest in the long term," he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)