Five Chinese IPOs shelved after regulator stiffens rules

CSRC announced it would start investigating companies that are marketing their IPOs to investors

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-111714569/stock-photo-ipo-word-cloud-concept-on-a-blackboard-with-great-terms-such-as-initial-public-offering-issue.html" target="_blank">Image</a> via Shutterstock
Neil Gough Hong Kong
Last Updated : Jan 13 2014 | 11:52 PM IST
Five companies halted plans to sell shares on Monday after China's securities regulator moved to tighten restrictions on new listings, the latest sign of challenges as the mainland seeks to reopen its stock markets to new offerings after a yearlong ban.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced on Sunday that it would start investigations of companies that are marketing their initial public offerings to investors, monitoring comments made by executives during such meetings to ensure they did not break the law by disclosing information not included in their public stock exchange filings.

The commission also said it would monitor companies that sought to sell shares at higher valuations than the average for their industry and require them to make additional risk disclosures. Companies failing to comply would be barred from selling shares to the public, the regulator said.

Five companies that had been among the first since late 2012 to receive approval to sell shares in mainland China said on Monday that they would suspend their IPO plans on the ChiNext market in Shenzhen, a secondary board mostly for start-up companies, and on another secondary board for small and midsize enterprises.

The companies are the Beijing Forever Technology Company, the Ciming Health Checkup Management Group Company, the Hebei Huijin Electromechanical Company, Netposa Technologies and the Nsfocus Information Technology Company.

All five said in announcements to the stock exchange that they were pulling their listings in response to the regulator's move. The withdrawals follow the announcement on Friday by Jiangsu Aosaikang Pharmaceutical Company that it was aborting its IPO.

The development is a setback for China's plans, set forth after a meeting in November of the Communist Party leadership under President Xi Jinping, to give the market a bigger role in the process of stock listings.

The Shanghai composite index was the worst-performing in Asia last year, despite the country's status as the world's fastest-growing major economy.

Investors fear the markets will be flooded by new listings from the backlog of more than 700 companies that are waiting to sell shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen, the result of a moratorium on IPO's that had been in place from October 2012 until January 1 this year. In deciding to unfreeze the IPO market, the securities regulator had announced a number of policies intended to strengthen investor protection, increase corporate disclosure requirements and generally to give the market a freer hand in the listing process.

In addition to announcing the resumption of IPO's, the authorities unveiled several changes meant to partly shift market oversight from an approval-based regime, where the regulator vets deals individually, to a disclosure-based system similar to that in the US, with the burden of full compliance on the companies.

At the same time, Chinese regulators are attempting to tweak rules to make the process of valuing share sales more transparent.

China's IPO market has been plagued by numerous cases of companies whose shares surge on their first day of trading - the only day when gains or losses are not capped at 10 percent - only to plunge below the initially offered price in subsequent days. This has left many ordinary Chinese investors with burned fingers, and partly explains why trading volumes on the benchmark share index declined for three years in a row, from 2009 to 2011.

But in seeking to curb outlandish price swings in share debuts, the securities regulator may cause the management and major shareholders of I.P.O. candidates, if they are unable to get the valuation they want, to reconsider whether pursuing a domestic share sale makes sense.


©2014 The New York Times News Service
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 13 2014 | 11:34 PM IST

Next Story