Apple received $1 billion from its rival in 2014, according to a transcript of court proceedings from Oracle Corp's copyright lawsuit against Google. It has an agreement with Apple that gives the latter a percentage of the revenue Google generates through the Apple device, an attorney for Oracle said at a January 14 hearing in federal court.
Rumours about how much Google pays Apple have circulated for years, but the companies have never publicly disclosed it. Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, and Google spokesman Aaron Stein both declined to comment on the information.
The revenue-sharing agreement reveals the lengths Google must go to keep people using its search tool on mobile devices. It also shows how Apple benefits from Google's business model that Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook has criticised as an intrusion of privacy.
Oracle has been fighting Google since 2010 over claims that the search engine company used its Java software without paying for it to develop Android. The showdown has returned to US District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco after a pit stop at the US Supreme Court, where Google lost a bid to derail the case. The damages Oracle now seeks may exceed $1 billion since it expanded its claims to cover newer Android versions.
Annette Hurst, the Oracle attorney who disclosed details of the agreement at last week's court hearing, said a Google witness questioned during pretrial said that "at one point in time the revenue share was 34 per cent." It wasn't clear whether that percentage is the amount of revenue kept by Google or paid to Apple.
An attorney for Google objected to the information being disclosed and attempted to have the judge strike the mention of 34 per cent from the record.
"That percentage just stated, that should be sealed," lawyer Robert Van Nest said, according to the transcript. The magistrate judge presiding over the hearing later refused Google's request to block the sensitive information in the transcript from public review. Google then asked Alsup to seal and redact the transcript, saying the disclosure could severely affect its ability to negotiate similar agreements with other companies. Apple joined Google's request in a separate filing.
'Highly sensitive'
"The specific financial terms of Google's agreement with Apple are highly sensitive to both Google and Apple," Google said in its January 20 filing. "Both Apple and Google have always treated this information as extremely confidential."
The transcript vanished without a trace from electronic court records at about 3 pm Pacific standard time with no indication that the court ruled on Google's request to seal it.
The case is Oracle America Inc vs Google Inc, 10-cv-03561, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
