Negative campaign: Clinton launched one of the most vicious campaigns in US presidential campaigns against Trump. Associated Press had reported that 24 out of the 32 ads on TV released by the Clinton camp had references to Trump in it. Most of them had visuals of Trump rather than containing the views of the voters on him.
Unimpressive presidential debates: Although Clinton was more composed than Trump, she often harped on her experience more than her vision. Her agendas look good on paper. But Clinton failed to present coherent arguments, as was expected from her, to back her policy vision. A case in point, her plan to make college education debt free without being clear on how would colleges be funded.
Using Trump’s victims for her campaign: Clinton not just pointed out former Miss Universe Alicia Machado(Pictured) during the second presidential debate as having been harassed by Trump, but used her as an effective campaign tool to rally Hispanic voters behind her. Machado's campaign for Clinton gave the impression that she was being exploited by Clinton for her own means.
PROUD
Exhibiting a global mindset:Maybe it’s her experience as secretary of state or the initiation as the first lady with Bill Clinton. But Clinton certainly has a global perspective which was evident during her campaign and the presidential debates. From China to Syria, from NAFTA to Mexico, her world view as opposed to Trump’s myopic vision was evident.
Admitting she was wrong: With the email controversy threatening to negatively impact her campaign, Clinton took a bold step by admitting that she was wrong to set up a private server for her emails. Doing so during the second presidential debate further convinced voters that she was more honest and reliable than her opponent.
Regulating Wall Street: Clinton has promised to increase prosecution of executives who indulge in corporate wrong doing. She emphasized the need for bankers to work for the American public and not for their selfish ends. Although these were pre-election promises, Clinton’s intent was commendable.
Getting more funds than Trump: From January 2015 to October 2016, Clinton managed to raise $687 million FROM Super Political Action Committees (PACs) and individual donors. In contrast, Trump managed to raise merely $250 million from all sources. That just might make the difference in who emerges as the next U S President.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)