Hollywood's 'Crazy Rich Asians' set to break stereotypes, if not box-office

"Crazy Rich Asians" represents the latest effort by Hollywood to diversify its talent pool, both in front of and behind the camera

Crazy Rich Asians
Crazy Rich Asians poster | Photo: Twitter (@CrazyRichMovie)
Jordyn Holman and Anousha Sakoui | Bloomberg
Last Updated : Aug 13 2018 | 10:45 PM IST
By the usual Hollywood standards, “Crazy Rich Asians” is a modest rom-com, set to generate about $18 million in its North American debut starting Wednesday.

But the true sign of its success may be whether it helps usher in more films like it. Hollywood hasn’t produced a movie like this -- featuring a mostly Asian cast -- in 25 years. Like “The Joy Luck Club” in 1993, “Crazy Rich Asians” is also based on a best-selling book, and many will see it as a test of the broader appeal of an American movie with Asian themes.

“Many of us are hoping it is the dawn of a new era,” said Janet Yang, an executive producer of “The Joy Luck Club.” “The desire to finally stake a claim in the industry has been bubbling to the surface for a while.”

“Crazy Rich Asians” represents the latest effort by Hollywood to diversify its talent pool, both in front of and behind the camera. Walt Disney Co.’s “Black Panther” shattered box-office records this year and helped demonstrate the global appeal of movies with black themes and casts.

“It was really important for us for it to have ownership in the Asian-American community -- this is their moment,” Terra Potts, an executive at Warner Bros. who oversees multicultural marketing, said in an interview.

Big and Glossy
 
“Crazy Rich Asians” is a chance for Asian-Americans to see themselves on the big screen in a film that’s “big and glossy, and doesn’t show them in a position of poverty or struggle,” Potts said. The move is “not highlighting stereotypes, just celebrating who they are and the complexity of not only being Asian but Asian-American.”

Asians have been almost invisible in Hollywood. In a survey of popular movies, researchers at the University of Southern California found that fewer than 5 per cent of characters were Asian and more than one in three movies had no Asian speaking characters at all. Four per cent of all directors were Asian or Asian-American; Asian female directors were nearly nonexistent in the sample.

In its annual study of moviegoers by race and ethnicity, the Motion Picture Association of America broke out attendance by Asian-Americans this year for the first time. They found per capita attendance was highest among Latino and Asian audiences, with Asians making up 8 per cent of frequent filmgoers in 2017, even though they only make up 6 per cent of the US population.

Money to Spend
 
“The biggest excuse that Hollywood has had around Asian-American talent is that there’s no evidence of box-office draw around Asian-American leads,” said Andrew Lee, an Austin-based film producer who hosted a soiree fundraiser to promote the movie. “Asians actually do spend money. It’s time to put our money where our mouth is.”

In “Crazy Rich Asians,” Constance Wu plays a native New Yorker who goes to Singapore to meet her boyfriend’s family, only to discover they’re super rich and her boyfriend, played by Henry Golding, is one of Asia’s most eligible bachelors.

With any cast, it would be a far smaller movie than “Black Panther,” which benefited from a massive budget, years of anticipation and Marvel Entertainment’s global fan base. “Crazy Rich Asians” had a budget, before marketing costs, of just $30 million. But as with “Black Panther,” other filmmakers are eager to see whether “Crazy Rich Asians” will have broad appeal.

General Audience

“We are looking forward to how the general audience, not just the Asian-Americans, will react to a movie like this where almost everyone in the cast is Asian,” said Francis Chung, head of US productions for South Korea’s CJ Entertainment, which has several American film projects in development. “It’s one of those rare moments where we get to see an Asian-American cast not doing a martial-arts movie.”

Critics have reacted positively, according to review aggregator RottenTomatoes. “Joy Luck Club” was also a critical hit and had modest box-office success, earning $32.9 million in 1993. That was more than Martin Scorsese’s “Age of Innocence,” but less than Jane Campion’s “The Piano.”

“I hope we will be able to look back on this time and say, ‘This is when things started to change,’’’ Yang said. “I see a lot of signs of that.”

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story