US lawmakers critical of House resolution on India

The House resolution also urges the US Government to continue its policy to not to grant visa to Modi

Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : Dec 10 2013 | 2:22 PM IST
A powerful Republican lawmaker has come out openly against a House resolution on religious freedom and human rights in India, arguing that it would weaken bilateral ties.

The House Resolution (No 417) among other things urges the US Government to continue its policy to not to grant visa to Narendra Modi, the BJP's prime ministerial candidate.

"H Res 417 weakens, rather than strengthens, the friendship between the US and India. The resolution runs counter to all the hard work that the American people, particularly those in the Indian American community, have done to improve the relationship," said Congressman Ed Royce, Chairman of the powerful House Foreign Relations Committee.

In a statement issued through US India Political Action Committee, an Indian American lobbying group, Royce did not mention Modi, but openly expressed his resentment against the resolution which was introduce in the House on November 18.

The total number of co-sponsors to this resolution has increased to 28, latest figures said.

Congressmen Keith Ellison from the Democratic Party and Joe Pitts from the Republican Party were the original co-sponsored of the resolution, which among other things also called on India to protect the rights and freedoms of religious minorities and asked the US government to include the matter as part of bilateral the Strategic Dialogue.

In another statement, Ranking Member Eni Faleomavaega of the Subcommittee on Asia and Pacific - which has broad jurisdiction for US foreign policy affecting the region, including India - said that he will not support H Res 417.

"I highly doubt H Res 417 will ever see Floor action. However, the timing of the Resolution is unfortunate as it unintentionally invokes the name of the US House of Representatives for purposes of influencing India's upcoming elections," Faleomavaega said.

Describing the resolution as "flawed" as it blames only Hindu nationalism for communal violence, the HAF said in a mass email urging Hindu-Americans to approach their Congressman not to co-sponsor the resolution.

A similar campaign was launched by Coalition Against Genocide (CAG) - a broader coalition of like-minded secular and Muslim groups in the US - urging Indian-Americans to approach their lawmakers to co-sponsor the resolution.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 10 2013 | 12:59 PM IST

Next Story