The notices, which were sent last week, sought details of grounds of appeal of the FIIs and why they should be granted relief. The DRP has also sought that the FIIs furnish information of profit and expenses that they had not given to the assessing officer, within nine days.
“A plain reading of the notices gives an impression that the legal proceedings would start from next week. We expected it to start only in the month of December as the DRP has nine months to act on an appeal,” said a source privy to the developments.
The government had informed that any fresh notices making a demand of MAT would be suspended till the three-member Shah committee gave its report.
The Committee on Monday had its first meeting where it took stock of the matter and is believed to have discussed the terms of reference and methodology it is going to adopt for deliberating the vexed issue.
Although the panel has a one-year term, sources said the committee would submit its report on the issue much earlier as the finance ministry was keen that it give its recommendations “expeditiously”.
The Committee report might not offer much help to the FIIs as legal proceedings are generally not governed or swayed by government reports.
Meanwhile, the FIIs are expected to approach the government, requesting them to ask the DRP for suspending the orders till the Committee submits its report. According to experts, the government could intervene as the DRP is part of the income tax (I-T) department, even though it is a legal body.
“These notices can confuse the foreign investor community. On the one hand, government has said the notices making a MAT demand have been kept under suspension and the Shah Committee has been set up to look at the past cases. On the other, the DRP is sending notices indicating the start of legal proceedings. Hopefully, the DRP will wait for the committee report and not start the appeal proceedings immediately since they have nine months to pass an order,” said Rajesh Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskin & Sells.
The I-T department had sent notices to 68 FIIs, demanding Rs 602.8 crore as MAT dues of previous years. This raked up a controversy, with the FIIs moving a higher court challenging the demand. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had, in Budget 2015-16, exempted FIIs from paying MAT with effect from April 1, 2015.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)