Brokers shy away from ICEX membership

Image
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 12:29 AM IST

Traders and brokers seem cautious about taking membership in Indian Commodity Exchange (ICEX), the fourth commodity futures exchange, promoted by Indiabulls Financial Services and public sector MMTC.

Many apprehend that a conflict of interest could emerge due to the promoters’ active involvement in commodity trading on existing platforms. As announced earlier, ICEX is planning to go live by the end of November.

At least half a dozen traders who are actively trading in agri and non-agri commodities on existing commodity exchanges said they were waiting to check any inter-exchange arbitrage opportunity on ICEX. ICEX is reported to have enrolled a little less than 100 members so far, a tenth of the membership of existing exchanges.

According to sources, Indiabulls has a commodity broking arm, Indiabulls Commodity, which has been trading on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX), National Commodity & Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX) and National Multi Commodity Exchange (NMCE).

When asked, a spokesperson for the Forward Markets Commission (FMC), the regulator, said promoters cannot trade on their own exchange. Section 5.2 of the Forward Contract (Regulation) Act says, “The proposed Exchange shall have a demutualised structure, ie, the shareholders of the Exchange shall not have any trading interest either as a trading member or client at the Exchange.”

Ajit Mittal, CEO of ICEX, declined to comment on the issue.

Apparently, an exchange is privy to confidential information, client IDs, details of trade and position of members. This information, if known, to other members/market participants can be used to make unfair gains from confidential information, as well as poach clients of the member. Brokers are worried about the confidentiality of their client IDs and transactions, as the compliance office of ICEX is based out of the same office where Indiabulls’ broking arm is located.

The broking community across asset classes is supposed to fully trust the system to avoid any leak of information on their top-performing clients, as well as positions taken and trades executed. This information is sensitive and can upset their business or trading calls.

“An exchange has to be neutral so that such sensitive information cannot be used for vested interest. World over, there is no case of one broking arm promoting an exchange. There have been instances where a group of brokers have come together to set up an exchange but a broker-led exchange challenges the very fundamentals of a marketplace,” said a broker, on condition of anonymity.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 19 2009 | 12:34 AM IST

Next Story