Capital market regulator Securities Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has laid down the rules for market players to set shop in the IFC. But the participants are awaiting clarity from the government on tax treatment before they firm up their plans. An adverse tax regime and inefficient legal system could deter players.
| EYE ON THE TAX-MAN |
|
“All taxes put together cannot be more than what is levied in financial centres such as Singapore, Malaysia and Dubai because we are in direct competition with them. The government is working on it and we are hoping that there will be some concessions,” said Ramakant Jha, MD&CEO, GIFT.
Currently, there are no taxes to be paid in the Dubai Financial Centre. Malaysian IFC charges a tax of three per cent, while Singapore enjoys tax rate of 10 per cent. Sources said GIFT regulations might exempt players from the dividend distribution and the securities transaction tax (STT).
“All our taxes, be it withholding tax, dividend distribution tax or minimum alternate tax and the rest put together should not be more than 10 per cent,” said Jha. The government is likely to issue guidelines in the next three-four months, officials said.
Also, experts said the government’s dilemma lay in trying to lure in foreign investors through tax sops but without any revenue losses to the exchequer.
“The whole concept is to encourage people to set up operations in the country and provide them with a tax environment, which they are not subject to anywhere else. There have been several attempts in the past to do that,” said Siddharth Shah, partner — corporate and funds, Khaitan & Co.
“So, if you are serious about setting up an offshore financial centre, it is imperative to have a comparatively conducive tax regime,” he said.
Further, officials said the Reserve Bank of India, which is expected to announce guidelines related to IFC next week, could exempt these entities from coming under the aegis of the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Besides, capital account convertability norms might also not apply to these entities, officials said.
Apart from the tax-treatment, GIFT officials have also asked for a faster and more efficient alternate disputes resolution mechanism, which would redress legal matters within a span of six months. The first level would consist of a set of accredited arbitrators who would settle the matter within three months. Those dissatisfied with this can approach the appellate body, which would take three months to resolve the dispute.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)