Sector lobby Association of Mutual Funds in India (Amfi), in a meeting early this week, opposed the non-compete fees of Rs 850 crore being paid to Analjit Singh and other promoters of the Max group. According to them, this was an unfair deal for the minority shareholders of Max Financial Services. Amfi urged fund managers to vote against the deal. Voting will be over on September 24.
“This money should have come to the minority shareholders which also include us. It is against ethics and I am opposed to this proposal of non-compete fees to a person entity and not the shareholders,” said the chief executive officer (CEO) of a fund house, who did not wish to be named.
Taking into account the holding of 44 million shares, the stake of fund houses in Max Financial Services at the closing price of Thursday stands at about 16.48 per cent.
Put together, a little more than Rs 2,500 crore of equity assets have found its way into the counter of Max Financial. This is quite a substantial amount. What is interesting is the fact that nearly Rs 1,675 crore or about 70 per cent of the total is invested by a dozen of the top schemes.
Among the top schemes having most investment in Max Financial Services are Reliance Equity Opportunities (Rs 348 crore), ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund (Rs 262 crore), Motilal Oswal MoST Focused Multicap 35 (Rs 178 crore), Kotak Select Focus (Rs 162 crore), HDFC Mid Cap Opportunities (Rs 139 crore), Reliance Growth Fund (Rs 135 crore) and Reliance Regular Savings Fund (Rs 69 crore), among others.
Though, Amfi has requested fund houses to oppose this during the voting, fund managers told Business Standard it was their own call, which may or may not be in line with Amfi’s, signalling the possibility of divergent views on the matter.
“We have booked good gains on the counter as we were buying into the stocks till May-June. Given the sudden steep rally in Max Financial during June-July period, we took a sell call on the counter and booked profits,” said the chief investment officer (CIO) of a fund house, who seemed unperturbed with the non-compete clause and said the counter had made much more than that.
It is worth noting that the stock was hovering between Rs 340 and Rs 390 during April-May. But, after that, it surged sharply and touched a high of Rs 627 in July — a gain of over 80 per cent since the start of the financial year. During the same time, benchmark stock indices were up in higher single digits.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)