With most of the agencies investigating NSEL and related issues either reporting to or checking with the ministry of finance, “coordinated action will (now) be possible in the NSEL case”, said a regulatory source. The FMC is the regulator at present for FMC and finance ministry officials were saying they lacked authority to act against NSEL.
One reason for the NSEL crisis was a regulatory vacuum on spot exchanges. Futures exchanges come under FMC. NSEL wanted to allow one-day forward deals, which allow such exchanges to square off their positions intra-day but to ensure these not be considered futures, they and two other spot exchanges had received an exemption from the ministry of consumer affairs. Using that power, that ministry stopped all such deals on NSEL in July. When a crisis emerged at the exchange after it suspended trading, the ministry gave powers to FMC to solve the issue. Now, these powers get automatically vested with the finance ministry, said a regulatory source.
The enforcement directorate has already given a report on its findings. This report suggests members/borrowers of NSEL resorted to money laundering. The income tax department says money raised on NSEL wa deposited in the accounts of the borrowers. The Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank are also probing for systemic risk in the fallout. All these report to or coordinate with the finance ministry.
FMC had already warned the board of directors of NSEL that their ‘fit and proper’ status was under risk. It could pursue action on this front, which would have implications for the other regulators. The promoters of NSEL, the FT group, had also promoted the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX), a commodity futures exchange; a stock exchange, MCX-SX; and a power bourse, Indian Energy Exchange. If found not fit to run NSEL, the other regulators will have to take cognizance. A decision will be taken after the two task forces set up on the issue by the finance ministry give their reports.
FMC had also issued a couple of notices to MCX. It said the exchange could not enter into any financial transaction without its permission, a precaution to stop MCX bailing out its promoters. The second one was in the case of an NSEL-promoted company and its clearing member, Indian Bullion Merchants Association, which had traded on MCX and this was seen by FMC as a violation of its norms. FMC is expected to take punitive action in this case.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)