Sebi revokes penal order against 7 in MCX insider trading case

On August 2 last year, Sebi's then whole-time member S Raman had held 13 former top MCX officials and its erstwhile promoter guilty of insider trading

SEBI
Photo: Reuters
Dilip Kumar Jha Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 07 2018 | 12:34 AM IST
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has revoked its last year’s interim order against seven individuals in an insider trading case pertaining to share trading of the Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX).

The markets regulator found no violation of insider trading guidelines by the “seven notices”. A few of them were also denied cross-examination opportunities, it observed.

Sebi whole-time member Madhabi Puri Buch on Friday revoked the order against Joseph Massey, former managing director (MD) of MCX; Shreekant Javalgekar, former MD of MCX; Anjani Sinha, former MD of NSEL; and four others — Asha Javalgekar, Paras Ajmera, Tejal Shah, and Mehmood Vaid.
 
The markets regulator, however, clarified that a separate order would be passed against Hariharan Vaidyalingam, former director of National Spot Exchange (NSEL), in the case.

On August 2 last year, Sebi’s then whole-time member S Raman had held 13 former top MCX officials and its erstwhile promoter Financial Technologies (India) (now renamed 63 Moons Technologies) guilty of insider trading in MCX shares and ordered them to pay the impounded averted losses of Rs 1.24 billion.

Interestingly, the MCX and FTIL boards had some common directors during the investigation period between April 27, 2012 and July 31, 2013.

The individuals were asked to “disgorge the unlawful gain” with an interest of 12 per cent in the interim order, as Sebi alleged these individuals — many of them were employees of MCX and FTIL or their relatives — had “prior information” about the possible payment default at FTIL subsidiary NSEL, which prompted them to sell their MCX shares to avert losses.

Following this order, a number of MCX and 63 Moons officials had approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal, pleading innocence. They had also sought the matter to be disposed of expeditiously without granting relief.

A major payment crisis of Rs 55.74 billion broke out at FTIL’s subsidiary NSEL in July 2013, with 23 defaulters borrowing this money. Subsequently, a number of government agencies, including Enforcement Directorate, Economic Offences Wing of the Mumbai Police, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and Sebi launched probes in the matter.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story