Cricket Australia calls off player pay talks

Image
ANI Melbourne [Australia]
Last Updated : Dec 19 2016 | 1:07 PM IST

Cricket Australia (CA) has postponed pay talks with the Australian Cricketers' Association (ACA), saying the on-going negotiations can distract the players at this busy time of the season.

"In the period that will see tens of thousands of fans enjoy BBL matches, and the cricket community prepare for another Boxing Day Test, that cannot be assured if discussions continue under current arrangements with the ACA," cricket.com.au quoted a CA spokesperson as saying.

"Players deserve the opportunity to focus on the game, rather than being distracted by a negotiation that should be conducted in a professional and confidential manner," he added.

The governing body and the ACA are negotiating a new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and informal meetings between the two are due to take place this week.

However, the CA has now postponed the discussions until the new year after the players' union raised concerns about issues relating to female players, including a controversial pregnancy clause.

The cricket board also accused the ACA of failing to negotiate in good faith.

"Cricket Australia is committed to a negotiation that is conducted in good faith between the two parties, but will not take part in a process which seeks to draw its players into a public dispute," the CSA said.

Last week, the ACA submission sent to players highlighted several "outdated at best and rather condescending" issues relating to female cricketers, including a controversial clause wherein female players are asked to sign a contract saying they are not pregnant.

Firing back at the critics, Cricket Australia chief executive James Sutherland had said the issue had been misrepresented and put players in a difficult position.

He further insisted that the current negotiation was a chance to develop a policy "that keeps the health and safety of women, and their babies, first and foremost."

Meanwhile, Cricket Australia had confirmed on Saturday that the independent organisation, charged with educating and encouraging compliance with Australia's workplace laws, was seeking further clarification over its contracts.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 19 2016 | 12:54 PM IST

Next Story