Declaring Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism may prove to be a counter-productive move, scholars suggest.
During a panel discussion at a Washington think tank, Woodrow Wilson Centre's Asia Programme, three scholars dismissed the suggestion, arguing that doing so would not help coerce Islamabad into changing its policies, Dawn reported.
Labelling a country "a state sponsor of terrorism, is not a surgical instrument, that's a really, really heavy hammer," said Stephen Tankel, an assistant professor at School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington.
"The sanctions that come with that pretty much obliterate any chance you have engaging on a whole host of other issues," he added.
Daud Khattak, Senior Editor, Radio Mashaal, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty raised questions about further steps to be taken, in case the move and sanctions imposed on the country prove ineffectual, "Let's declare Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism today. But what next, if there's no change? Will you take some more serious steps?"
Madiha Afzal, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, Washington, and author of 'Pakistan Under Siege: Extremism, Society, and the State' suggested alternative steps and "less single-minded approach, to actually make Pakistan move."
Afzal also urged the Trump administration to work with China to persuade Pakistan to listen to US complaints about Islamabad's role in Afghanistan, assuring that "Pakistan will listen."
With increased attacks in Afghanistan, assumed to be sponsored by Pakistan, suggestions are being made to declare the latter a "state sponsor of terrorism."
Earlier in January, US President Donald Trump slammed Pakistan, saying that 33 billion dollars in aid were "foolishly given (to) Pakistan" over the last 15 years, and alleged that the country gives safe haven to the terrorists who carry attacks in Afghanistan.
This was followed by Washington suspending military aid to Pakistan until it took decisive steps against terrorists.
However, Pakistan has categorically denied the accusation.
Recently, Pakistan's Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa claimed that Pakistan does not have any organised terror outfits on its soil.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
