HP: HC writes to state govt to clarify its stand on Human Rights Commission, Lokayukta

Image
ANI General News
Last Updated : Nov 01 2019 | 10:00 PM IST

Taking serious note of the inaction of the state government in the implementation of the Supreme Court's orders, the High Court directed that in the event of failure to file reply by the state government within a week, appropriate orders in the matter will be passed on the next date of hearing.

A division bench comprising Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary and Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua passed these orders on a petition filed by one Namita Maniktala.

It has been alleged in the petition that the protection of Human Rights Act 1993 mandates the creation of the State Human Rights Commission (HRC), but the state of Himachal Pradesh has failed to implement the mandate of the act and no appointments have been made to the commission since June 15, 2005 and no Human Rights Courts have been established.

The petitioner has further alleged that the Apex Court in D K Basu's case has directed the respondent state to make functional the State HRC within a period of six months from the date of the judgment passed in the year 2015, however, three years have passed but still the judgment has not been implemented and the commission has not been made functional.

She has alleged that the act of the state is not only illegal but also contemptuous and has prayed to direct the state to constitute the State HRC and make it functional by making the appointment of the chairpersons and members in accordance with the Section 21 of Protection of Human Rights Act.

She has further prayed to direct the state to initiate appropriate action under Section 30 of Protection of Human Rights Act for the constitution of Human Rights Courts within the state and to fill up the future vacancies in State HRC not later than 3 months from the date such vacancy occurs.

After the hearing, the court contended that the state government's approach in the matter is not appreciated, that too when the Apex Court has held that it is mandatory for every state to constitute "State HRC" as well as "Human Rights Court".

The next hearing in the case has been scheduled on November 7.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 01 2019 | 9:46 PM IST

Next Story