A new study has recently revealed that humans quickly started speaking in a now-familiar form of language.
At some point, probably 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, humans began talking to one another in a uniquely complex form. It was easy to imagine this epochal change as cavemen grunting, or hunter-gatherers mumbling and pointing.
But in the latest paper, an MIT linguist contended that human language likely developed quite rapidly into a sophisticated system: Instead of mumbles and grunts, people deployed syntax and structures resembling the one that is used today.
Shigeru Miyagawa, Professor of Linguistics and the Kochi Prefecture-John Manjiro Professor in Japanese Language and Culture at MIT, said that the hierarchical complexity found in present-day language was likely to have been present in human language since its emergence.
However, this was not a universally accepted claim: Many scholars believe that humans first started using a kind of "proto-language," a rudimentary, primitive kind of communication with only a gradual development of words and syntax.
But Miyagawa thought this was not the case. Single words, he believed, bear traces of syntax showing that they must be descended from an older, syntax-laden system, rather than from simple, primal utterances.
Miyagawa had an alternate hypothesis about what created human language: Humans alone, as he has asserted in papers published in recent years, have combined an "expressive" layer of language, as seen in birdsong, with a "lexical" layer, as seen in monkeys who utter isolated sounds with real-world meaning, such as alarm calls.
Miyagawa's "integration hypothesis" holds that whatever first caused them, these layers of language blended quickly and successfully.
Miyagawa's integration hypothesis was connected intellectually to the work of other MIT scholars, such as Noam Chomsky, who have contended that human languages are universally connected and derive from our capacity for using syntax. In forming, this school of thought holds, languages have blended expressive and lexical layers through a system Chomsky has called "Merge."
The study is published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
