MEA terms ICJ verdict on Jadhav unanimous, unambiguous

Image
ANI New Delhi [India]
Last Updated : May 18 2017 | 8:57 PM IST

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday described the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) stay of Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav's death sentence as a matter of great relief for India and termed the verdict as "unanimous" and "unambiguous" binding on Pakistan.

"The ICJ's order has constituted an 'essential first step' in ensuring justice for Jadhav. Pakistani authorities must remember that the order of the court is legally binding," said Baglay, spokesperson of the MEA.

"The Government of India hopes the ICJ's order would remedy the violations of Jadhav's rights and the violations of the international convention by Pakistan. India is a law abiding country and it expected others to follow international law," Baglay added.

Earlier in the day, the ICJ had announced its verdict on the Kulbhushan Jadhav case and had dismissed Pakistan's claim that it did not have jurisdiction over the matter.

Justice Ronny Abraham of the ICJ read out the much-awaited verdict and asserted that the case was indeed debatable, while also adding that the ICJ had prime facie jurisdiction in the case.

Abraham added that under the Vienna Convention, India should have received consular access to seek justice for the former Indian Naval officer.

The only condition under which Jadhav now stands to face execution is if Pakistan does not comply with the ICJ's decision.

India can then go to the Security Council, which may then decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgement.

The UN charter entails that 'each member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of the International Court of Justice' and 'if any party to a case fails to perform the obligations, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council.'

A Pakistan military court had awarded the death sentence to former Indian naval officer Jadhav on April 10 for alleged "espionage and subversive activities."

However, India, after being denied consular access for 16th time, dragged Pakistan to the ICJ on May 8 for violating the Vienna Convention.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 18 2017 | 8:57 PM IST

Next Story