No evidence still, but Russia did it to undermine Clinton, help Trump: Clapper

Image
ANI Washington D.C. [U.S.A.]
Last Updated : May 09 2017 | 7:13 AM IST

Former director of National Intelligence James Clapper has told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that he still has not seen "any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals."

Clapper testified on Monday before a Senate judiciary subcommittee about Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the Washington Post reports.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

He replied in affirmative.

Clapper had earlier said, "We did not include any evidence in our report, and I say, 'our,' that's NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report."

Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates declined to answer, when asked the same question.

Clapper was also asked why the original report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election did not include the so-called "Russian dossier" which cropped up weeks later in the Trump administration.

He said, "We couldn't corroborate the sourcing."

Clapper also said that Russia's meddling in last year's U.S. presidential elections amounted to a "high-water mark" in its decades-long efforts to interfere in political contests.

He hoped Americans recognised the severity of the threat posed by Russia and that the U.S. moved to counter Moscow before it "further erodes the fabric of our democracy," he added.

Clapper also asserted that Russia was now "emboldened" to interfere in elections in the U.S. and around the world.

Clapper ended his statement with a reminder to the American public and the Senators of what this investigation was really about, CNN reports.

He quipped, "Russia did, without doubt and with little consequence, deploy resources and tactics to disrupt America's presidential election -- to undermine Hillary Clinton, and to help Trump's campaign. Stated without drama or emotion, it was nonetheless sobering.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 09 2017 | 6:25 AM IST

Next Story