Former director of National Intelligence James Clapper has told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that he still has not seen "any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals."
Clapper testified on Monday before a Senate judiciary subcommittee about Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the Washington Post reports.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
He replied in affirmative.
Clapper had earlier said, "We did not include any evidence in our report, and I say, 'our,' that's NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report."
Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates declined to answer, when asked the same question.
Clapper was also asked why the original report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election did not include the so-called "Russian dossier" which cropped up weeks later in the Trump administration.
He said, "We couldn't corroborate the sourcing."
Clapper also said that Russia's meddling in last year's U.S. presidential elections amounted to a "high-water mark" in its decades-long efforts to interfere in political contests.
He hoped Americans recognised the severity of the threat posed by Russia and that the U.S. moved to counter Moscow before it "further erodes the fabric of our democracy," he added.
Clapper also asserted that Russia was now "emboldened" to interfere in elections in the U.S. and around the world.
Clapper ended his statement with a reminder to the American public and the Senators of what this investigation was really about, CNN reports.
He quipped, "Russia did, without doubt and with little consequence, deploy resources and tactics to disrupt America's presidential election -- to undermine Hillary Clinton, and to help Trump's campaign. Stated without drama or emotion, it was nonetheless sobering.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
