Only one in five child abuse victims treated at major trauma centres: Study

According to a new study, only one in five victims with serious injuries caused by child abuse in England and Wales gets treated at a major trauma centre.

This happens despite the fact that such children are three times more likely to die of their injuries as compared to those who have been injured unintentionally.

Physical abuse is an important cause of major trauma for children, but has a different injury and age profile from unintentional injuries.

The scientists wanted to find out if there were any differences in how these two groups of children were treated before and after reaching the hospital.

They, therefore, examined the case information for children under 16 years of age, supplied by hospitals to the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) for England and Wales between April 2012 and June 2015.

Between 2012 and 2015, all details of 7,825 children were entered into database, 7,344 (94 percent) of whom were classified as unintentional (accidental) injury, and 481 (six percent) of whom were classified as suspected child abuse.

Children suspected of having been physically abused were much younger than those with unintentional injuries: three out of four were under the age of one, with an average age of four months.

Their injuries were more severe and they were more likely to have a serious head injury.

These children were also more likely to reach hospital by car, rather than by emergency transport and to arrive some considerable time after being injured--averaging eight hours compared with one hour for children involved in accidents.

Once they reached hospital, they were less likely to receive time critical, potentially life-saving procedures, with only one in five treated at a major trauma centre.

The researchers also noted that organised trauma care networks rely on correct and prompt identification of patients with serious injury and emergency transport direct to a trauma care centre rather than the local hospital.

"This study shows that trauma care systems need to modify their conventional approach to activation to enable early recognition of these infants and swift escalation up to 'major trauma patient' status in order to minimise delays to delivery of definitive care," they wrote.

They believe, without the right trigger, delays are likely, and outcomes for these children are likely to be poorer.

The study was published in Emergency Medicine Journal.