A new study has found that while teens with normal weight parents tended to be more fit, having physically active parents didn't affect teens' level of fitness.
Cardiorespiratory fitness influences health in youth and adulthood, said lead study author Eliane Peterhans, a sports sciences researcher at the University of Konstanz in Germany.
"It is very important to understand how adolescents behave because then you have a chance to correct unhealthy behaviors," she added.
The study was part of a large German study and included 1,328 teens. Researchers used bicycles to assess participants' cardiorespiratory fitness and gathered information about their and their families' health behaviors.
Peterhans and her colleagues found that having two parents with normal weight positively predicted cardiorespiratory fitness in both boys and girls. Since body weight is related to nutrition, having normal weight parents may reflect an overall healthier family environment, the researchers suggested.
However, having parents who were physically active did not influence teen fitness, suggesting that teens may not regard their parents as role models for fitness.
Having a normal body weight and health behaviors such as going to the gym, engaging in leisure time physical activity, and riding a bike to school most strongly predicted cardiorespiratory fitness for both boys and girls, but this association was generally stronger for boys.
Boys who spent less than two hours per day in front of the television or computer were more likely to be fit than boys who reported more screen time. Screen time did not have a significant effect on girls' fitness, although only 40 percent of girls spent more than 2 hours per day in front of a screen compared to 65 percent of boys.
Overall, family health behaviors were less related to girls' cardiorespiratory fitness than boys' fitness.
Aaron Carrel, M.D., medical director at the University of Wisconsin Health's Pediatric Fitness Clinic commented, "I thought that was an important finding...that the same things that work for boys may not work for girls. If we are trying to intervene and create much healthier environments-whether it's in schools or communities-the more we understand what impacts boys and girls differently, the more we can successfully design better interventions."
The study appeared in the Journal of Adolescent Health.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
