Plea filed in SC to reduce pendency of cases

Image
ANI New Delhi [India]
Last Updated : May 26 2018 | 9:45 PM IST

A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Ministry of Law to take appropriate steps to reduce the pendency of cases from 15 to 3 years.

The petition, filed by Supreme Court lawyer and Delhi unit's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Spokesperson, Ashwini Upadhyay, claimed that the Apex Court should pass a direction to the Secretary-General to plan an Annual Calendar in a way so that the Courts function at least 225 days per year and 6 hours per day as suggested by the Law Commission Report.

The 112-page petition, a copy accessed by ANI, further pleaded for take appropriate steps for setting-up Division Benches at District Level and pass such other order as this Court may deem fit and proper to reduce the pendency of cases and minimize the probability of Procedural / Judicial error and allow the cost of the petition to petitioner.

It is immediately unclear as to when the petition would come up for hearing before the Apex court. But sources in the Supreme Court registry said the petition may come up for hearing in July.

The petition also stated that the paramount purpose of the speedy trial is to safeguard the innocent from undue punishments but prolonged pendency has created unaccountable barriers in this regard. Huge numbers of cases are pending for years together, which create mental and economic pressures on the litigants.

The Indian Judiciary would take 320 years to clear the backlog of about 31.28 million (approximately 3.3 crores) cases pending in various courts in India. The reason for the backlog of cases pending is inadequate judge strength which is 13.05 judges per one million people, the petition further claimed.

The petition, filed by Upadhyay, sought a direction to the Ministry of Finance to allocate sufficient funds from National Resources or Consolidated Fund of India to meet the demands of State Judiciary in line with the recommendations of the National Commission to look into the issues of the judiciary, the petition further claimed.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 26 2018 | 9:39 PM IST

Next Story