Citing a report in United States' news daily New York Post, President Donald Trump has attacked New York Times stating that the news daily's deteriorating readership could have improved had it been honest about its reports.
"The failing @NYTimes would do much better if they were honest!" Trump tweeted on Tuesday.
The tweet linked a report written by New York Post columnist John Crudele in which he spelled out his reason to cancel his subscription of New York Times.
In the report Crudele said, "I canceled my subscription to the New York Times because I felt the paper had become ethically challenged in its coverage of the presidential election."
"Soon after the election - one in which the Times' favorite candidate, Hillary Clinton, lost - the paper admitted its mistakes," he added.
The columnist also tore apart the paper's coverage which made "Clinton look unstoppable and Trump to look 'frazzled'."
Crudele further criticised the paper's coverage of the federal investigation into whether Trump associates helped Russia meddle the 2016 presidential election and Trump's wiretapping claims.
Though the Times has been dismissive of Trump, the paper claims that it hasn't hurt their business.
The company said that its subscriptions doubled last year during the election.
Hours later, Trump tweeted, "Why doesn't Fake News talk about Podesta ties to Russia as covered by @FoxNews or money from Russia to Clinton - sale of Uranium?"
According to a report by conservative news site Breitbart.com, Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, may have violated federal law when he failed to fully disclose details surrounding his membership on the executive board of Joule Unlimited and the "75,000 common shares" he received. The energy company accepted millions from a Vladimir Putin-connected Russian government fund.
As for the uranium deal in question that Trump has called the "the Bill and Hillary deal", in 2010, Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, was one of nine federal agency heads to sign off on Russia's purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One, an international mining company headquartered in Canada with operations in several U.S. states. It was part of a regular process for approving international deals involving strategic assets, such as uranium, that could have implications for national security.
Some investors with an interest in making the Uranium One deal go through have a long-time relationship with Bill Clinton and have donated to the Clinton Foundation. But there's no concrete evidence those relationships or donations helped make the deal go through, reports the Politifact.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
