UK must be more strident in criticising Pakistan's assault on free speech

Image
ANI London [United Kingdom]
Last Updated : Jan 16 2018 | 11:20 AM IST

There is a rising concern in Britain that its government is inexplicably keeping quiet about Pakistan's assault on free speech.

In an article written for the Guardian, Jon Boone, former writer for the paper on Pakistan and Afghanistan, has categorically said the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) should be protesting about the kidnap and torture of social media activists.

He says that their abduction and reported torture by agents of the state has resulted in them avoiding criticising the country's military establishment and militant religious groups backed by the army.

Over the past month or more, a peace activist has been abducted from Lahore, a Marxist professor has been murdered and a kidnapping attempt was made Taha Siddiqui, an outspoken journalist.

Boone says, "Britain has had nothing to say about this growing assault on free speech, even when it involved a journalist who contributes to British media outlets, including this one. But there were no public condemnations. Not even the meekest expression of concern."

While he acknowledges that terrorist-related violence in Pakistan has come down, he feels that at times the UK seems keener to challenge negative international perceptions of Pakistan than the Pakistani government itself.

"While terrorist violence is sharply down, it has been achieved in a way that is unlikely to be sustainable: a campaign of illegal abductions and killings rather than root and branch reform of an incapable police and broken judicial system. The business environment remains unreformed, and the country never far from its next economic crisis," Boone adds.

He questions as to why Britain prefers to believe the endless promises of successive Pakistan Army chiefs about the situation improving, when actually that is far from the truth and may never happen.

Pakistan, he opines is a "deep state" running amok, and therefore, it is imperative that "Britain should not be blind to the problems that remain, or (be) afraid to raise its concerns publicly."

He is also critical of the fact that British diplomats conduct diplomacy with Pakistan Army generals at in their headquarters in Rawalpindi, and believes that this is actually compromising the bilateral relationship, and further undermining the authority of elected civilians in Pakistan.

Pakistan is one of the few countries where the public displeasure of the British high commissioner might have a useful effect and impact, he concludes.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 16 2018 | 11:20 AM IST

Next Story