40 projects stuck in litigation stall investment of Rs 4 lakh crore: ASSOCHAM

Image
Capital Market
Last Updated : Jan 19 2015 | 11:15 AM IST
Making out a strong case for commercial court in every high court and special benches for high value litigations, the ASSOCHAM said 40 projects worth over Rs 4 lakhs crores are stuck in litigation process in different courts and tribunals.

An ASSOCHAM paper on 'Reforms in Indian Legal System,' contended that delays in timely disposal of high value cases are taking a huge toll on the country's GDP and prompting some foreign Commercial Courts assuming jurisdiction in disputes even where no cause of action arose in those countries.

Further, the contention of the foreign courts in assuming jurisdiction in commercial disputes even where no cause of action arose in those countries is dilatory processes in India where disputes linger on for years together causing economic losses to the parties in the dispute and policy uncertainty among investors.

While the Indian judiciary is respected the world over for independent judicial processes, there are concerns over long delays in disposal of cases. As per latest statistics collected by ASSOCHAM, Supreme Court has 63,843 cases pending as on 1st May, 2014, High Courts have 44,62,705 cases pending and the Lower Courts have 2,68,38,861 cases pending as of December 2013.

To speed up the resolution of commercial disputes, the ASSOCHAM has suggested various measures including creation of better infrastructure, filling up of vacancies of Judges and clarity in regard to the role of appellate tribunals. Since the IPR regime is gaining importance and has caught the attention of the global investors, there should be special benches for IPR cases.

Besides ad-hoc arbitration be stopped completely and the Arbitration Act should be amended and the system of arbitration should be made more credible and effective. Also there should be an international standard Arbitration centre in Delhi on the lines of New York / London / Singapore.

The ASSOCHAM paper suggested a clear National litigation Policy responsibility should be fixed for frivolous litigation.

The Supreme Court of India in consultation with the government should come out with a policy under which Trial Courts are asked that the cases - civil or criminal, which are pending under the Trial Courts for more than 20 years be closed.

Similarly, the apex court should issue instruction that litigations under arbitration must be finished maximum within one year and in case of any delay the arbitration cases must be subject to scrutiny by the relevant High Court or Supreme Court beyond one year.

Powered by Capital Market - Live News

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 19 2015 | 10:56 AM IST

Next Story