GAAR implementation by the government ought to happen as scheduled as foreign institutional investors and such other portfolios have been escaping capital gains in one form or the other, keeping the domestic industry at disadvantages and, therefore, it should come out openly in support of the government to implement it as scheduled, said Dr. Adhia.
Delivering his address at a Post Budget Interactive Session - Implications of Union Budget 2016 under aegis of PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Dr. Adhia sought the support of Indian industry to let the government put in place GAAR implementation by 2017 as the move is in its interest.
Referring to the issue of MAT, the Revenue Secretary held that its existing rates cannot be curtailed as industry is being provided with so many exemptions in other forms and the government has already done the balancing exercise in a planned and meticulous manner and, therefore, seeking to reduce the MAT ceiling would not be opportune at this juncture.
On the issue of corporate tax reduction as promised by the Union Finance Minister while presenting the Budget proposals of last fiscal, Dr. Adhia clarified that if the finance ministry curtailed general corporate tax by one per cent in budget proposals for 2016-17, it would mean a revenue loss of Rs.15,000 crore which the government at this juncture could not afford due to prevailing adverse global conditions on account of which our exports have consistently suffered in the last couple of months.
However, the government has extended this benefit for new manufacturing units to avail of corporate tax facility at the rate of 25% from 2016-17, he pointed out adding that the budget for 2016-17 has been exclusively designed to generate domestic demand with large allocations for spending in rural economy, especially in its agricultural, irrigation, power and infrastructure sector since global economic landscape is not yet favourable to absorb exports from developing nation such as India.
In his welcome remarks, President, PHD Chamber, Dr. Mahesh Gupta reiterated the demand of the Chamber to reconsider the dividend distribution tax that has been brought in the budget of fiscal 2016-17 though the Revenue Secretary stayed put non-committal on this issue.
Powered by Capital Market - Live News
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
