BJP leader Arun Jaitley Saturday hit out at the AAP government, saying it did not carry out its responsibilities according to the constitution during its protest in the capital.
Jaitley hoped Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal realises the difference between a fast at Rajghat (Mahatma Gandhi's memorial) and giving a call to policemen to abandon their duties and obstructing the Republic Day parade.
The Bharatiya Janata Party leader said in an article on his website that the right to peacefully protest was part of legitimate political activity and every citizen has the right to dissent through protest.
Referring to Kejriwal defending his protest despite prohibitory orders, Jaitley said there was a responsibility on an elected government and its head to carry on governance in accordance with the constitution.
"If we examine the details of what the AAP government in Delhi did, the answer to the question will be self-evident. The ministers abandoned the Sachivalya (secretariat). They took police by surprise and engineered a dharna (sit-in) at a place where it was prohibited.
"They broke the law. They sent messages to supporters to assemble in large numbers. Their supporters tried to break the police barricade. The head of the government delivered a speech advocating anarchy as a form of government," Jaitley said.
He said Kejriwal "appealed to policemen to go on leave, discard their uniform and join the protest".
"He threatened to obstruct the Republic Day parade by marching lakhs of his supporters on to Rajpath. If the police in Delhi had responded to his call and abandoned their duty coupled with an invasion of his supporters during the Republic Day parade, could it be said that the governance is being carried on in accordance with the constitution. The answer to this question is a definitive 'no'," Jaitley said.
The leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha said there was a difference between sitting on a fast at Rajghat and giving a call to policemen to abandon their duty.
"I am sure Arvind Kejriwal realises this," Jaitley said.
Kejriwal Saturday defended his agitation.
The AAP leader, who had rebelliously called himself an "anarchist" during the agitation, said the constitution did not prevent a chief minister from protesting.
He asserted that if needed, he would agitate again.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
