PMK founder S. Ramadoss on Saturday said the marks-for-money scam in Anna University should be probed by a team of experts drawn from different fields rather than being investigated by the anti-corruption wing of the government.
In a statement issued here S. Ramadoss said it is said that officials at various levels in the Anna University were involved in the re-evalutiaon of answer sheets scam.
According to Ramadoss, the scam cannot be probed by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) wing alone. Using the holes in the procedure for re-evalution of answer sheets the intricate marks-for-money scam was perpertrated.
He said only education experts and those involved in education administration alone can understand the issues involved in this scam.
The PMK leader said the state government should constitute a team comprising of senior DVAC officials, education experts and those involved in education administration to probe the scam.
The varsity has suspended its former Controller of Examination G.V. Uma, a Professor in the Department of Information Science and Technology, for the irregularities reported in the re-evaluation of engineering examination answersheets, officials said.
Tamil Nadu Minister for Higher Eduction K.P. Anbalagan told reporters that evidence was being collected against the suspects.
On Friday Ramadoss had demanded a probe into the role of private engineering colleges as well as former Vice Chancellors and Education Department officials in the scam.
Investigating a complaint regarding irregularities in the re-evaluation of answersheets, the DVAC had registered a case against 10 officials including Uma, Controller of Examinations between 2015 and 2018.
DVAC teams had also searched Uma's house here, apart from those of P. Vijayakumar and R. Shivakumar in Dindivanam and the office of Controller of Examinations on August 1.
According to DVAC, students who had applied for re-evalution of answersheets paid Rs 10,000 per subject to get higher marks.
In 2017, 302,380 students had applied for re-evaluation, of which 73,733 passed exams and 16,636 others improved their scores.
Officials were accused of destroying original answersheets of students who had paid bribes.--IANS
vj/prs
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
