Cannes do attitude: Bit of sun, some sand and lot of hype (Column: Bollywood Spotlight)

Image
IANS
Last Updated : May 26 2018 | 1:30 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

Here we go again. Last week, our films and filmmakers headed to the scenic French town for a bit of sun and a lot of hype. How many of the films that we take to Cannes each year actually end up being recognised as cinema of worth in the international arena?

If truth be told, Indian cinema remains a bit of a joke in the international arena. We have the regular desi festival junkies who visit Cannes, Berlin and Toronto year after year. But what happens to films that are shown, and apparently applauded, at these global film festivals (every Indian entry claims to get a standing ovation)?

Well, nothing.

Hansal Mehta's Omerta, which was screened at the Toronto Film Festival last year, released in India last month to near-empty theatres and abysmal collections. Anurag Kashyap's Mukkabaaz which opened to tremendous expectations sank without a trace. With it also sank talented actor Vineet Singh's hope of becoming a star.

Not only do films get labeled 'festival types', actors too get branded as festival regulars. Nawazuddin Siddiqui has rapidly become one. He was seen at Cannes again this year representing Nandita Das's Manto. A film that won wah-wahs from the critics but would be largely ignored by the masses who would rather see a bio-pic on Sanjay Dutt than Sadat Hassan Manto.

The sad fact of life about self-crowned cinematic masterpieces is that they amount to nothing more than self-pleasure. All those associated with a 'festival film' think they have a great product on their hand while audiences prefer Judwa 8 to Omerta and Golmaal 19 to Titli.

That's the sobering truth all arthouse cinema must live with.

At Cannes, I saw everyone -- from Manoj Bajpai to Mallika Sherawat -- this year. What were they doing there? Manoj, it seems, was representing a film titled Bhosle. Like many of the films that choose to be premiered at international film festivals, this one too is likely to sink when it releases in India.

At least Manoj and Nawazuddin have a reputation for being festival-friendly actors. But what is Mallika Sherawat's credentials for going to Cannes year after year? Whom does she represent? Has she ever had a single film of hers shown at Cannes? Does she even qualify as an actor any more?

We need to seriously answer questions about Indian cinema's presence in the international arena. Besides Ritesh Batra's The Lunchbox, which Indian film in recent times has made a global impact?

Shekhar Kapur, who is the only Indian filmmaker to make a global impact since Satyajit Ray, thinks India has a long way to go before making a mark in the Western market. "I think a global curiosity about Bollywood in the West has existed for nearly ten years. However, that curiosity still remains unexplored by us. I think we've a huge amount of filmmaking talent. But they are not provided the right opportunities."

Shekhar feels it is lack of funds which is the culprit. "There is a reason why China is so far ahead. They aspire to be world class. We don't. Someone like Anurag Kashyap is defeated by the finances here," he said.

Bandit Queen, which Shekhar made, was done on a "really measly budget", as he says it. But according to him the problem is that too many of Indian filmmakers aspire to do genres that do not come naturally to Indians. "They got very heavily influenced by Mexican films, because Mexican filmmakers have attained a global recognition that we have not," he says, adding that everyone in India is happy just being a small player.

"When our films do 200 crores or 300 crores we are happy. Everyone congratulates one another. Slumdog Millionaire did 2,000 crores," he points out.

Shekhar agrees that the only Indian film to have a made a global impact in recent times is "The Lunchbox". Now director Ritesh Batra is making films from outside India.

"I believe we've chained ourselves by celebrating the Indian market. It is dominated by just a handful of big players. Any business that is monopolised by a few cannot grow because there isn't much innovation or diversity," Shekhar says.

I agree, wholeheartedly.

(Subhash K Jha can be contacted at jhasubh@gmail.com <mailto:jhasubh@gmail.com>)

--IANS

skj/hs/tb

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 26 2018 | 1:18 PM IST

Next Story