Chhattisgarh PDS scam: Approach HC, SC tells petitioners

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 12 2015 | 8:28 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked petitioners seeking a court-monitored CBI probe into the public distribution system (PDS) scam in Chhattisgarh to approach the high court as it was in a better position to address the issue.

A bench of Justice T.S. Thakur, Justice V. Gopala Gowda and Justice R. Banumathi said "the high court will be in a better position to examine the matter and record the findings".

"If you have any difficulty, you can always come to us. It will not be right (for the apex court) to listen to everything, grab and not let the high court function," the bench told the petitioners.

At the outset of the hearing, when Justice Thakur asked counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for one of the petitioners, to go to the Chhattisgarh High Court, he replied: "In this case, top authorities are involved. You name them, they are there."

Telling the court "Why I said what I had said", Sibal added that even the head of the Anti-Corruption Bureau has said in a video that some dimensions of the PDS scam reaches a place which they cannot investigate.

When high dignitaries are involved, what investigation will take place, Sibal asked, and quoted the ACB chief as saying: "There are certain people we can't reach."

The counsel said investigators have got a diary that contains all the names.

As Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Chhattisgarh, sought to dispute what was being attributed to the Chhattisgarh ACB chief, Sibal took out a mobile phone, urging the apex court to listen to the video recording of what the ACB chief said.

Sibal said the state corporation was purchasing paddy from farmers and giving it to rice mills, and they in turn were returning third rate rice which beneficiaries under PDS were refusing to take.

The court witnessed some frayed tampers as the attorney general said the entire matter was "politically motivated", while Sibal retaliated saying "politically motivated at your end".

As one of the lawyers told the court that in the FIR, 26 people were named but it came down to 16 in the charge sheet, Rohatgi said: "Go back to the special judge and tell him that these are the people."

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 12 2015 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story