Court hears Musharraf's review petition

Image
IANS Islamabad
Last Updated : Jan 28 2014 | 5:08 PM IST

Supreme Court of Pakistan Tuesday heard the review petition filed by former president Pervez Musharraf against the court's verdict issued July 31, 2009, against the 2007 emergency declared by him.

A 14-member judge bench of the apex court is reviewing the petition filed by the former army chief here, Geo News reported.

Musharraf's lawyer Ibrahim Satti Advocate said the former president was given the right to make amendments in the constitution and changes were made in more than 100 articles.

Also Read

He said Musharraf issued a new oath for judges following the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) in 2000 and that former chief justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was also among those who took oath under the PCO.

A reference was filed against the former chief justice March 9, 2007 while the Supreme Court ordered his restoration July 20, 2007.

After the former chief justice was restored, the referring authority did not file a review petition.

Ibrahim Satti Advocate further argued that original draft of the PCO was not made part of the court's order.

On this, Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani inquired about the content of the original draft. Replying to this, Satti said emergency was imposed Nov 3, 2007 after consulting the armed forces and chief of army staff. The governor, corps commander and chief of army staff were on board regarding the decision.

Former premier Shaukat Aziz had apprised Pervez Musharrf through a letter that the country was going through a constitutional crisis.

Ibrahim Satti said Musharraf issued three orders Nov 3, 2007. The first order was issued as the chief of army staff, while the others regarding the judges' oath was issued as the president of Pakistan.

When the case was initiated, Musharraf was not a party to it. The attorney general gave a statement saying that the government did not support the Nov 3 steps, Satti said.

Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani said parliament did not endorse the steps taken Nov 3, 2007. Ibrahim Satti said Pervez Musharraf received the notice April 22, but he was in London due to the threats he had received from the Taliban.

It may be mentioned here that a 14-member bench of the apex court had declared the Nov 3, 2007, emergency imposed by Musharraf as illegal and unconstitutional.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 28 2014 | 5:00 PM IST

Next Story