Court says yes to Vodafone tax claim, no to blocking de-merger

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 15 2015 | 7:32 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that while the tax authorities could move under the law to raise tax claims against Vodafone, in another case involving the de-merger of its towers business, the assets transfer, as such, cannot be blocked.

The apex court bench of Justice Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh told the income tax department that there existed enough protection in the Gujarat High Court order for it to raise the tax demands.

In effect, the bench upheld the verdict of the Gujarat High Court that had approved the de-merger of Vodafone's tower assets in 2012, even as the tax authorities had claimed a loss of Rs.1,200 crore to the exchequer on account of capital gains and stamp duties.

Challenging the Gujarat High Court order, the tax authorities had submitted to the apex court that the mobile phone major had used some objectionable ways to evade the said taxes, while it transferred its towers infrastructure to a separate company.

While reiterating the high court order, the apex court said the right of the tax department was kept intact to carry out appropriate proceedings regarding the recovery of tax from the transfer as the case may be, or from any other person who is liable.

The bench asked why the tax department was interfering when it was a private arrangement.

While granting sanction for the scheme of arrangement, the Gujarat High Court had protected the right of the Income Tax Department to recover the dues, in accordance with law, irrespective of the sanction of the scheme.

Vodafone is facing another tax liability claimed by the authorities, amounting to Rs.11,200 crore and pertaining to its 2007 acquisition of Hutchison Whampoa's stake in India's telecom company Hutchison Essar. The company has challenged the claim.

In another tax dispute with the same group, the government last month decided not to contest the Bombay High Court's order on Oct 10, 2014 that Vodafone was not liable to a pay tax demand of Rs.3,200 crore in a case transfer pricing.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 15 2015 | 7:28 PM IST

Next Story