Flexible work schedules aren't just more convenient, they can really make a difference in the way we feel and for our long-term health, a study reiterates.
In today's fast life, our daily schedules often don't match our bodies' natural rhythms. This causes a 'social jetlag' as we lose sleep.
The condition can be a particular problem for shift workers, who work into the night or on a shifting schedule.
"A 'simple' re-organisation of shifts according to chronotype allowed workers to sleep more on workday nights," said Till Roenneberg of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University in Germany.
"As a consequence, they were also able to sleep less on their free days due to a decreased need for compensating an accumulating sleep loss. This is a double-win situation," Roenneberg added.
The researchers got the chance to implement their ideas about sleep and work schedules in a real-world factory setting.
The factory workers were assigned to an early, late, or intermediate chronotype based on their normal sleep patterns.
The researchers then implemented a chronotype-adjusted ("CTA") shift schedule.
Morning people were never made to work late and night owls were never forced to get up early for work.
With those adjusted schedules, people felt more satisfied with the sleep they did get and experienced slight improvements in their general well-being.
It also reduced social jetlag - the difference between the midpoint of workers' sleep on work versus free days - by one hour.
While the new findings weren't exactly a surprise, Roenneberg said, it was still "utterly satisfying to find that theory actually works in the real and 'dirty' world".
An earlier report by Roenneberg's team showed a link between social jetlag and obesity, along with other unhealthy habits, including smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol and caffeine.
"We know that sleep has important implications not only on physical health but also on mood, stress, and social interactions, so that improving sleep will most probably result in many other positive side effects," said Celine Vetter, the first author of the study.
The findings were reported in Current Biology.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)