Glaring errors in Jayalalithaa verdict, claims prosecutor

Image
IANS Bengaluru
Last Updated : May 12 2015 | 11:02 PM IST

The Karnataka High Court's judgment acquitting former Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalithaa and her three aides had glaring errors in computing their assets, special public prosecutor B.V. Acharya claimed on Tuesday.

"The learned judge (Justice C.R. Kumaraswamy) has given details of assets and income on page 913 of the voluminous (920 pages) judgment. As per prosecution, total assets were valued at Rs.66.65 crore, based on the argument of construction cost of properties and wedding expense of V.N. Sudhakaran," Acharya told IANS here a day after the verdict was delivered.

Sudhakaran is the disowned foster son of 67-year-old Jayalalithaa.

Sudharakan, his aunt Sasikala Natarajan and her aunt J. Ellavarsi were also acquitted in the disproportionate assets' case, in which the trial court convicted and sentenced them to four years jail with a fine of Rs.10 crore each.

"The amounts calculated and figures mentioned by the trial court, prosecution and defence counsels do not tally. Reasons attributed for the expenses are conflicting and numbers mentioned by the trial court judge, the prosecution and defence counsel are contradictory," Acharya said.

For instance, the trial court judge (John Michael Cunha) has assumed the wedding expense to be Rs.5 crore, while the prosecutor (Bhavani Singh) claimed it was Rs.6 crore.

The prosecution did not take into account the income of the accused in the form of loans from state-run banks. The total of 10 loan accounts was Rs.24.15 crore, he said.

"Therefore, in terms of percentage, there is a glaring arithmetical error. As it has come to our notice only now, we are considering all options that are available. If we decide to file an appeal before the Supreme Court, it will be an excellent way to get relief," Acharya said.

In a related development, Karnataka Law Minister T.B. Jayachandra said he would consult Acharya and the state Advocate General Raviverma Kumar on whether to file a special leave petition in the Supreme Court against the high court verdict acquitting Jayalalaithaa.

"I have asked the law secretary to study the verdict. We will consult the SPP and the AG and take a final decision soon," Jayachandra told reporters here.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 12 2015 | 10:52 PM IST

Next Story