The Delhi High Court Wednesday stayed till Sep 19 a trial court order seeking registration of an FIR against Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit for allegedly misusing funds in an advertisement campaign before the 2008 assembly polls.
Justice Sunil Gaur, in an interim order, granted relief to Delhi CM Dikshit by staying the trial court order of Aug 31.
Deferring the matter to Sep 19, the court said: "Till then, status quo as of today in respect of FIR (First Information Report) in question be maintained."
The court had, Tuesday, reserved order in the matter and issued notice to Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Vijender Gupta and the Delhi Police chief.
The Delhi government moved the court against the trial court's Aug 31 order directing police to register an FIR against Dikshit on the complaint of Gupta and Right to Information activist Vivek Garg, alleging that Dikshit misused Rs.22.56 crore of government funds for an advertisement campaign ahead of the 2008 assembly polls.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sidharth Luthra, appearing for the state government, had said that Gupta, while filing the complaint against Dikshit and seeking registration of the FIR, relied upon a Lokayukta report. The ASG said there was no material other than that report with the complainant in this matter.
Luthra said the complaint was "motivated and frivolous".
Gupta's senior advocate Sanjay Jain argued that the complaint was initially filed before the Delhi Lokayukta, who indicted Dikshit for allegedly misusing government funds for an advertisement campaign with a "political purpose".
In his complaint, Gupta sought the registration of an FIR against Dikshit and others for alleged criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation of public funds and criminal misconduct, under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Earlier, police filed a status report and said "no criminal offence is made out against the chief minister".
In his complaint, Gupta said that in 2007-08, Dikshit was the chief minister of Delhi and also minister in-charge of information and publicity. He alleged that she had misused "the government machinery and public funds and burdened the state exchequer in carrying out the campaign of the Congress party for her (Dikshit's) own political gains".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
