The Hyderabad High Court on Monday expressed displeasure over the failure of the Andhra Pradesh authorities to prevent cockfights during Sankranti celebrations this month despite its orders.
The court sought to know from the Chief Secretary and the DGP as to why they had failed to prevent cockfights despite clear court orders.
A Division Bench headed by Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan on Monday heard a public interest litigation in the matter.
In response to orders issued last week, Chief Secretary Dinesh Kumar appeared in court. Director General of Police M. Malakondaiah had sought exemption from personal appearance.
The court asked the officials to submit details of cockfights held in East Godavari and West Godavari districts. The bench directed for information on who all organised the cockfights at over 800 places in the two districts, number of cases registered and details of the accused.
The court accepted the plea of the Chief Secretary and police for more time to provide the details, and adjourned the hearing by four weeks.
The court once again voiced unhappiness over certain public representatives organising cockfights despite court ban orders.
Earlier, the court had asked the Chief Secretary and the DGP whether they were feeling helpless in implementing its orders.
The PIL has been filed by one K. Ramchandra Raju of West Godavari district, who wanted the court to stop betting and several vices that have crept into villages in the name of culture and cockfights.
The High Court this month asked the state government to prevent cockfights. The Supreme Court had also dismissed the plea against the ban.
However, the cockfights were conducted at several places in coastal Andhra with impunity during Sankranti, the harvest festival celebrated from January 13 to 15.
Every year, crores of rupees change hands as cockfights are organised on a massive scale during week-long Sankranti holidays. Politicians of all hues, businessmen, and celebrities also participate in such cockfights.
Animal rights activists say the authorities have always failed to implement court orders on the matter.
They point out that as per the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the Andhra Pradesh Gaming Act, 1974, cockfights are illegal.
--IANS
ms/tsb/vm
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
