Tokyo, May 15 (IANS/EFE) Japan's government Thursday proposed revising the country's pacifist constitution to enable Japan extend military support to its allies in case they are attacked.
The proposal that was prepared by a panel of experts on the request of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is the first step towards modifying the traditional interpretation of the Japanese constitution.
That document clearly prohibits the use of force in resolving international disputes.
With this modification, Japan seeks to "contribute more to global peace and stability", Abe said in a press conference.
Nonetheless, the prime minister wanted to "make it clear" that he seeks to preserve the pacifist character of the Japanese constitution although he advocated an "active pacifism".
The main objective is that Japan should be able to exercise the "right to collective self-defence" and intervene militarily in order to defend allied countries under attack, the report read.
Talking about the rising tension in the Pacific zone, the document pointed out, in particular, the missile and nuclear tests of North Korea and China's increasing number of maritime operations.
According to the current interpretation of the constitution, Japan cannot ensure its security nor contribute to global peace and stability, the report said.
Japan's constitution allows the use of force to defend the country's territory against a possible attack, a provision that, according to experts, should be extended to allow military aid to its allies.
With the new interpretation of the constitution, it would not be necessary to change the legal text, a sensitive issue as Abe's Liberal Democratic Party does not have the support of its coalition ally, the Buddhist New Komei Party (NPK), in this matter.
The report sets forth six conditions for the use of military force in other territories.
These include third countries "with a close relationship" with Japan expressly requesting Tokyo's help, and Japan's intervention should not significantly jeopardise national security.
In addition, the proposal mentions concrete examples of activities that Japan cannot carry out under the current text but that would be possible with the revision.
These consist of defending US ships that are attacked close to Japanese territory or intercepting missiles launched towards the US.
--IANS/EFE
ab/dg
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
