Judge orders action on Bengal policeman for accused's double arrest

Image
IANS Kolkata
Last Updated : Oct 31 2014 | 8:55 PM IST

West Bengal's Mamata Banerjee regime, which has on several occasions faced a rap from the courts, Friday was yet again at the receiving end of judicial ire, as a judge ordered removal of a police officer for showing the arrest of an accused twice before him.

Already facing the wrath of the opposition over the violence in Makhra and Chaumondolpur villages of Birbhum district, the Trinamool government was left red in the face as the Suri Chief Judicial Magistrate Indranil Chatterjee ordered departmental proceedings against the officer-in-charge of Parui police station K.M. Ghosh for showing the arrest of Ali Jinnah twice.

The magistrate also ordered that the police officer who has on record arrested one accused twice be suspended.

Ali Jinnah, allegedly involved in the Makhra violence, was nabbed Oct 24. He was produced before court for the second time Oct 30 as a fresh arrest case.

Assistant public prosecutor Kuntal Chattopadhyay said the police officerA had apologised in court for the faux pas.

"A police officer in Parui police station committed a mistake. Police have admitted their mistake and sought apology. The judge has ordered a departmental inquiry into the role played by the OC in the case," Chattopadhyay said.

The violence at Makhra left three dead Monday.

The legal woes of the Banerjee government have been continuing since long.

In a telling blow to the ruling Trinamool Congress, the Calcutta High Court, in two different cases has ordered CID and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probes respectively against two its prominent leaders infamous for making hate speeches.

While Birbhum district Trinamool president Anubrata Mondal, who gained notoriety for his hate speeches is facing a probe by the CBI, Lok Sabha member Tapas Paul is under the scanner for threatening to kill and rape rival political activists.

Earlier, the Trinamool's ambitious legislation to return land to farmers from whom it was forcibly acquired for an industrial unit in Hooghly district, was declared "unconstitutional and void". The court also struck down another law that allowed levying a one percent tax on the entry of certain goods into the state.

The state government suffered a similar fate in several other legal battles including its futile attempt to prevent a CBI probe into the Saradha scam which was eventually ordered by the apex court.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 31 2014 | 8:52 PM IST

Next Story