Kavanaugh argues he's an 'independent, impartial judge'

Image
IANS Washington
Last Updated : Oct 05 2018 | 9:10 AM IST

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, who is accused of alleged sexual abuse, wrote in an op-ed where he argued that he was an "independent, impartial judge" and conceding he "might have been too emotional" in his Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

"I was very emotional last Thursday (September 27), more so than I have ever been," Kavanaugh wrote in the op-ed for the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

"I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said. I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband and dad. I testified with five people foremost in my mind: my mom, my dad, my wife, and most of all my daughters."

Kavanaugh and California professor Christine Blasey Ford testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27 after Ford accused the nominee of sexually assaulting her when they were both in high school, CNN reported.

Ford alleges a drunken Kavanaugh pinned her down at a party and attempted to remove her clothes, covering her mouth when she tried to scream.

Kavanaugh vehemently denies the allegation.

In the op-ed, the Supreme Court nominee sought to assuage worries about how political he might be on the court.

"The Supreme Court must never be viewed as a partisan institution," Kavanaugh writes. "The justices do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle. They do not caucus in separate rooms."

He adds, if confirmed to the nation's highest court, "I would always strive to be a team player".

Kavanaugh said he has been "subjected to wrongful and sometimes vicious allegations," and that his time in high school and college "has been ridiculously distorted", adding that his wife and daughters "have faced vile and violent threats".

However, Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, who also sits on the Judiciary Committee, told CNN on Thursday night that he wasn't buying Kavanaugh's attempt at casting his testimony in a different light.

"This op-ed in no way removes the issue of temperament," Blumenthal said.

"That testimony was written, carefully prepared, planned, premeditated -- not some emotional outburst... Judges are supposed to put emotions aside."

--IANS

ksk

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 05 2018 | 9:04 AM IST

Next Story