'Love Day: Pyar Ka Din': Tedious and uninspiring (IANS Review, Rating: *1/2)

Image
IANS
Last Updated : Oct 22 2016 | 4:13 PM IST

Film: "Love Day: Pyar Ka Din"; Directors: Harish Kotian, Sandeep Chaudhary; Cast: Ajaz Khan, Anant Mahadevan, Sahil Anand, Harish Naagar, Shalu Singh, Vaibhav Mathur; Rating: *1/2

Fun, frolic and fantasy forms the crux of this bromance.

It is the tale of three friends, Monty (Ajaz Khan), Sandy (Sahil Anand) and Harry (Harsh Naagar) and their adrenaline-charged escapades. It is an outrageous and outlandish, coming-of-age film that meanders from a drab, teen drama to a hotchpotch, youth crisis.

Narrated from Harry's point of view, in a non-linear manner, the film begins with the three friends reconnecting after a long time. Sandy and Harry are now aspiring film makers seeking funds for their maiden film venture. They are on the way to meet Monty, who assures them the requisite money. And, while they are on their way, in flash-backs we are informed how Monty, obsessed with sex, is their key motivator for all things bad.

With dialogues like, "hame, raat ko 440 volts ka jhatke lage aur din mein, baap ke 440 fatke mile," which means - at night we got a 440 volts shock and the next morning we received 440 lashes from our fathers. The writing, by the director duo- Harish Kotian and Sandeep Chaudhary, is amateurish and rash.

The plot meanders aimlessly from one bad deed to another, with aplomb. Laced with sub-plots that include a bit of romance and suspense, the gags are passable, and ultimately underwhelming. It gums-up all tried and tested, film formulas, from various prominent hindi films, in a very shoddy manner that eventually leads to gaping plot-holes and half-baked characters.

On the acting front, Ajaz Khan exhibits the chutzpah of Monty with extra-zeal, that makes him obnoxious from the very word go. Sahil Anand and Harsh Naagar are perfect nincompoops wandering life's path, trying to put up the good boy act. Ananth Mahadevan is wasted, as Dr. Sheikh in an organ-trafficking scam. And the rest of the cast range from bad to worse.

Technically, the film is poorly mounted, in all respects.

With a title that is subjected to a double entendre, one expects a barrage of adult humour, but alas it is not so. Instead what you get is a disgusting display of depraved and recycled gags onscreen which make you frown sporadically and keep you wondering if they'll ever graduate to making some truly entertaining and meaningful fare.

Overall, watching the three in a poorly presented film, is a bit too tedious and uninspiring.

--IANS

troy/dc/vm

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 22 2016 | 4:02 PM IST

Next Story