Narsingh case gets murkier with outlandish allegations (Coloumn: Just Sport)

Image
IANS
Last Updated : Jul 26 2016 | 7:13 PM IST

How scary it is to find two Rio-bound Indian athletes testing positive for banned drugs and both rejecting the results. Wrestler Narsingh Yadav insists that his food supplements were spiked and so does shotputter Inderjeet Singh alleging fouplay in testing.

Rumours of conspiracy abound, some of them hard to believe and some others are so outlandish they can be rejected straightaway. The onus of proving the charges is on the athletes and they are of conjecture in nature without any fool-proof evidence as of now.

The whole thing got murkier with the bizarre allegation that a SAI official has conspired against Narsingh in collusion with an Olympian. Most wrestlers seem to think that he could not have taken any performance enhancing drug knowingly with the Games round the corner.

Sympathies apart, one can hardly find fault with the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) unless there is an inquiry into the procedure adopted at Sonepat where the wrestlers were training or, as Narsingh fears, checking his food supplements. Both are difficult to prove, considering the security the wrestlers have in Sonepat.

Sushil Kumar's childhood pal Yogeshwar Datt was the first top wrestler to come out to support Narsingh, saying he is sure he can't do it. He also wants a thorough inquiry into the whole episode. The statement is loaded.

The NADA disciplinary committee has had its first hearing on Narsingh and on will take a decision on Wednesday after another meeting with the wrestler.

As usual, the politicians have jumped into the situation. The Maharashtra chief minister and a senior union minister from the state are backing Narsingh. They want a thorough inquiry as to how the Mumbai wrestler failed the dope test. Incidentally, the president of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) is a Bharatiya Janata Paty MP and is believed to have met Prime Minister Narendra Modi a couple of days ago to apprise him of the case.

The sports ministry, headed by a Delhiwallah, has intriguingly no reaction. If one expected him to have some soothing words for Nasingh, they were not forthcoming. All he would say is that the Olympic contingent has been reduced by one athlete.

Many sports fans are sorry for Narsingh and some of them feel that his record is clean he can't be risk indulging in such an act at the most critical time of his career.

The man who must be feeling awful about the whole thing is Sushil Kumar, who took Narsingh and the WFI to court asking for a selection trial between the two to select the Rio entry for the 74kg.

Reacting to the needle of suspicion being pointed at him, Sushil distanced himself, saying once Narsingh was selected, he only wished him well. He also added that his support team should have been picked with care -- whatever that may mean. Sushil's initial reaction was wishy-washy and he quickly corrected himself.

Somoeone who has never failed a dope test, Narsingh naturally is shocked and the NADA stated that he has never resisted. The argument that his sparring partner was also tested positive is just circumstantial evidence. Why was the partner tested is neither here nor there, though Sandeep Tulsi Yadav has not fought for close to two years.

NADA says that testing Olympic-bound athletes more than once is not unusual, considering that some drugs can be detected in the short-term and some others in the long-term. So, there can't be any quarrel with the procedure.

After Narsingh, Inderjeet also failed the test and the athlete looked visibly shattered, breaking down while talking to television channels. NADA now says test results of all the athletes have not yet been been received, thus dropping a hint that the dope list is not final.

(Veturi Srivatsa is a senior journalist and the views expressed are personal. He can be reached at sveturi@gmail.com)

--IANS

vs/ajb/vm

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 26 2016 | 6:58 PM IST

Next Story