Across a number of faiths and cultures, people tend to date and marry others who share their religious beliefs. This is due to inferences about religious people's personalities, reveals a new study.
Now, new psychology research from New Zealand's University of Otago suggests this phenomenon -- known as 'religious homogamy' -- is partially a result of inferences about religious people's personalities.
The researchers measured how religious and non-religious individuals perceive the 'openness' -- a primary dimension of personality associated with intellectual curiosity -- of potential religious and non-religious mates.
They found that non-religious participants in particular associated religious behaviour with less openness, and that this inference led them to devalue religious individuals as romantic partners.
"The results illustrate that people's decision to partner with religious or non-religious individuals can be determined by personality traits that religiosity is believed -- rightly or wrongly -- to predict, rather than religion itself," said study co-author Jamin Halberstadt from the University of Otago, New Zealand.
In one experiment, religious and non-religious participants decided whether or not they would date 40 possible romantic partners who varied in how frequently they attended religious services.
The research team discovered that non-religious participants found potential partners less desirable, and also less open to new experience, as their religious behaviour increased.
In a second study, participants judged potential partners who attended religious services frequently or infrequently, some of whom also disclosed that they were open to new experiences.
Non-religious participants preferred non-religious partners, and also those who were open to new experiences, while religious participants showed the opposite preferences.
Further analysis suggested that religious and non-religious participants evaluate the same 'open' behaviours differently. That is, there was agreement that non-religious individuals are relatively open-minded, but not on whether being open-minded is a good thing.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
