SC finds centre's nod for CBI probes hampering

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 10 2013 | 8:51 PM IST

The Supreme Court Tuesday described as "hampering" a provision requiring the CBI to seek government sanction before proceeding against senior bureaucrats in corruption cases but the centre insisted on following the law.

When the court said that "investigation will be in accordance with the rule of law then law also includes Section 6A (of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act)", Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati told the apex court bench of Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph.

The bone of contention in the hearing, that was spread over two days, was Section 6A of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act which says that Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) will have to seek sanction from the competent authority before proceeding against senior bureaucrats.

The hearing related to the question whether in court monitored or court directed cases the CBI would require sanction from the government or not.

The court said it was in a "very rare case that court takes upon the task of monitoring investigation to restore the confidence of people in the rule of law and fair and free investigation".

Justice Lodha in a poser asked: "Is it not in the interest of the centre that in cases of public importance, the confidence of the people is restored in the credibility of the investigation and the rule of law?"

Vahanvati responded by saying: "Don't move on the presumption that Section 6A is bad or useless, the central government is not going to say no (to request for sanction by the CBI) but for the good reasons and court can look into it."

As Vahanvati told the court that the stage of sanction came when in the course of the preliminary enquiry the material available with the investigating agency pointed to a particular senior officer, Justice Lodha asked then why should there be a need for sanction.

"Because the law says so (take sanction)," said Vahanvati.

Justice Lodha said: "The law does not envisage court monitored investigation."

Justice Lokur asked Vahanvati: "Would it not create a situation of conflict when the government said no to a request for sanction to proceed against a senior bureaucrat and the court said yes?"

After the daylong hearing, the court permitted two weeks' time to the government to pass appropriate administrative orders on the CBI submission on improving efficiency of the investigating agency.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 10 2013 | 8:46 PM IST

Next Story