BJP leader Subramanian Swamy on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court, seeking to be impleaded in a public interest plea, alleging an Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer, probing the Aircell-Maxis case, possesses disproportionate assets.
As Swamy sought the nod of the court to be impleaded in the pending PIL, the vacation bench of Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Indu Malhotra asked him to mention it next week on Monday (June 25) as Justice Malhotra recused herself from hearing the plea.
Telling the court that the apex court, by its earlier order, had directed the investigation into the matter be completed within six months which are ending on July 12, he argued that allegations against ED officer Rajeshwar Singh were aimed to delay the investigation and the said officer was protected by the top court on several occasions earlier.
On June 5 on a PIL by Rajneesh Kapur, the vacation bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice Ashok Bhushan agreed to examine the plea alleging that Rajeshwar Singh has acquired disproportionate assets but no action was being initiated against him as he was protected by certain orders of the court passed in 2014 and 2017.
The petitioner had contended that the order of the top court protected Rajeshwar Singh against any mala fide or frivolous complaint but cannot be an absolute bar against any of his actions in breach of law.
Kapur had said that the top court could itself look into the allegations of disproportionate assets through an independent mechanism.
Saying that it would consider the prayer that the top court may itself look into the material against the ED officer, the court had on June 5 asked Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh to assist the court on the next date of hearing after obtaining necessary instructions.
Directing the listing of the matter before the appropriate bench, the court had also directed that the entire material relating to the allegation of the ED officer possessing disproportionate assets be placed before it.
Expressing its displeasure over investigation not being completed in a "serious" matter involving 2G cases, the top court by its March 12 order had directed that the "investigations shall be completed within six months in all the cases and on all the aspects of the matter and no stone shall be left unturned in this regard and all guilty shall be booked."
--IANS
pk/gt/vd
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
