Toprani feels CBFC is biased against new producers

Image
IANS Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 06 2017 | 1:32 PM IST

Veteran theatre director Janak Toprani feels the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is biased against new producers and says one needs backing from a "big production house or have big stars" to get the film passed easily.

He is distressed about the functioning of the board as his film "Call For Fun" got 'A' certificate with cuts when they had sought a 'U' certificate.

"Our film is naughty and has edgy humour but we didn't deserve an A certificate and that too with cuts. Forget the film, even our trailer had to be trimmed. CBFC members thought '36-24-36' was vulgar! I can think of several films that had the similar dialogue and were given UA certificate," Toprani said in a statement.

Produced by Filmquest, "Call For Fun" is scripted, directed and co-produced by Toprani. It launched nine newcomers.

The film's cast includes Zaan Khan, Shubhangi Mehrotra, Charu Asopa, Prashant Kanaujia, Aashish Gade, Priyanka Arya, Swagata Naik Prasad Shikhare and Linesh Fanse. It released on Friday.

"The Chairman (Prasoon Joshi) may have changed but the system remains unchanged. I sense the censor board is prejudiced against new producers, who produce a film without the backing of an established production house or established starcast," Toprani added.

Talking about "Call For Fun", he said: "Our film imbibes coming-of-age edgy comedy but it can't be classified vulgar or erotica! It's a fun film - yet there is no skin show, not even a single cuss word, but still we got an A because the board members thought the theme was not fit for teenagers."

Toprani went on to compare it with other films.

"Recently, CBFC has certified films like 'Vicky Donor', 'Shubh Mangal Saavdhan' and 'Poster Boys' dealing with adult subjects like a film about sperm donation, erectile dysfunction and vasectomy, with U/A certification despite dealing with adult themes which goes to prove that CBFC is discriminating against new producers.

"I can give examples of dialogues from these films that fall surely in adult category - but when pointed out, a member explained that such dialogue was a part of mother-daughter conversation, so it was allowed.

"I feel your film has to be backed by a big production house or have big stars to get passed easily. The committee members are subconsciously influenced by big names."

Toprani thinks "the system needs a total overhaul as it is against the principle of natural justice".

--IANS

sug/rb/mr

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 06 2017 | 1:26 PM IST

Next Story