'Trump would've been charged if he wasn't President'

Image
IANS Washington
Last Updated : May 07 2019 | 1:15 PM IST

Over 450 former US federal prosecutors have signed a statement asserting Special Counsel Robert Muellers findings would have produced obstruction charges against President Donald Trump, if not for the office he holds, the media reported.

The statement signed on Monday offers a rebuttal to Attorney General William Barr's determination that the evidence Mueller uncovered in his probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, was "not sufficient" to establish that Trump committed a crime, reports The Washington Post.

"Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice," the former federal prosecutors wrote.

"We emphasise that these are not matters of close professional judgment," they added.

"Of course, there are potential defences or arguments that could be raised in response to an indictment of the nature we describe here...

"But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice - the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution - runs counter to logic and our experience."

The statement is notable for the number of people who signed it -- 375 as of Monday afternoon, growing to 459 in the hours after it published.

Those signing it did not explicitly address what might happen next.

The signatures were collected by the Protect Democracy, which counts Justice Department alumni among its staff and was contacted about the statement last week by a group of former federal prosecutors, said Justin Vail, an attorney at the non-profit group.

"We strongly believe that Americans deserve to hear from the men and women who spent their careers weighing evidence and making decisions about whether it was sufficient to justify prosecution, so we agreed to send out a call for signatories," The Washington Post quoted Vail as saying late Monday.

"The response was overwhelming..."

--IANS

ksk

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 07 2019 | 1:04 PM IST

Next Story