US varsity set to ban Hindu religious symbol from campus

Image
IANS Washington
Last Updated : Apr 24 2015 | 3:07 PM IST

The George Washington University is preparing to ban from its campus an important Hindu religious symbol - the swastika - because it resembles the Nazi symbol and may hurt the sensibilities of some students, a media report said Friday.

The director of the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities and dean of student affairs will soon hold a hearing in the matter, according to a guest post in www.valuewalk.com.

However, many, including the university's public interest law professor John Banzhaf, are not amused.

"It is like banning the 6-pointed Jewish Star of David because some people might mistake it for the pentagram symbol and human sacrifice, or expelling a student for using the word 'niggardly' because other students may mistake it for a racist word and get upset," Banzhaf was quoted as saying.

Banzhaf, in a legal memo to key campus officials, has suggested that the university and its president may already be liable for defamation and other civil torts.

When a Jewish student studying Eastern religions recently returned from India with a religious symbol sacred to many Indians and others called a Sanskrit svastika (with a "V"), but another Jewish student initially mistook it for a Nazi swastika (with a "Wa), there was initial concern that it was meant as a threat to Jewish students.

However, within hours, all was explained, the student withdrew his complaint and said he had nothing to fear, and the campus police discontinued their investigation, read the post.

The university has seemingly taken the position that posting anything which could be mistaken for a Nazi swastika - even if it is of a different colour and orientation, and/or might be seen as "rotating" in the opposite direction - cannot be displayed on campus, even by students who are Hindus or Buddhists.

This effective banning of a sacred religious symbol, simply because it may look like something else, seems to be unprecedented.

"Banning one religious symbol - and even things that look something like it - while freely permitting the display of other religious symbols, would seem to be a clear violation of the DC Human Rights Act which prohibits discrimination based upon religious beliefs," said Banzhaf.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 24 2015 | 2:58 PM IST

Next Story